Selling the Invisible: Why Circadian Lighting Isn't About Brute-Force Brightness
- bizdev549
- Sep 10
- 3 min read
The conversation around daylight has always been about more than just illumination; it's about the well-being of the people who inhabit a space. As we explore the next frontier of human-centric design, a common and very valid question arises: "Isn't it true that we need incredibly intense artificial light to replicate the effects of the sun?"
It’s an excellent point. After all, a typical office space might be lit to around 300-500 lux, while a clear day outdoors can reach up to 120,000 lux. This sheer intensity gap seems impossible to bridge with artificial lighting without causing significant glare and discomfort.
But here’s where the conversation pivots from a focus on the quantity of light to its quality. The reason our body's internal clock responds so powerfully to the sun is not just because it's bright, but because of its specific color and spectral content.
Beyond Lux: The Discovery of a New Metric
For decades, we’ve measured light for its visual effects using a unit called lux, which quantifies the intensity of light as perceived by the human eye. This metric is weighted to the sensitivity of our cones, which are most responsive to green-yellow light.
However, the groundbreaking discovery of a third type of photoreceptor in the human retina, called intrinsically photosensitive Retinal Ganglion Cells (ipRGCs), changed everything. Unlike rods and cones, these cells don't contribute to vision. Instead, they act as the body's primary "light meter," signaling the time of day to our internal clock.
The photopigment in these cells, known as melanopsin, is a key biological lever. It is not uniformly sensitive to all colors of light but is instead highly responsive to a narrow band of blue-teal light, with a peak sensitivity at approximately 479-480 nm.
This is the crux of the matter: the sun’s immense power to regulate our biology comes from its rich concentration of these specific blue wavelengths, not just its total brightness.
This new understanding has given rise to a new, more relevant metric: Melanopic Equivalent Daylight Illuminance (MEDI). Rather than measuring light for vision, MEDI quantifies its biological impact on the circadian system. It tells us how much standard daylight would be needed to achieve the same circadian effect as a given light source.
The Spectral Solution: Achieving High MEDI at Lower Lux
With this biological insight, the problem of indoor lighting shifts from one of brute-force illumination to one of precise spectral engineering. By using spectrally tunable LED lighting systems, we can deliberately increase the proportion of the biologically active blue-teal wavelengths without raising the overall lux level to uncomfortable or energy-intensive heights.
Think of it as decoupling the light's visual intensity from its biological intensity. We can achieve the powerful, circadian-boosting effects of natural light at much lower and more comfortable lux levels by strategically enriching the light with the wavelengths that matter most.
For example, a typical office light with a warm color temperature (3500K) at full brightness might only produce a maximum of 80 MEDI. This provides a low circadian stimulus. However, a spectrally tunable system can be set to a much cooler color temperature (e.g., 4000K) and achieve MEDI levels of 300 at a sitting level—a value aligned with the requirements for promoting alertness and wakefulness—without the need for an overwhelming increase in lux.
This is the fundamental argument. We don’t need to replicate the staggering lux levels of a sunny day; we just need to replicate its most potent biological signal. By combining spectral sensors with intelligent, tunable lighting, we can deliver a dynamic solution that provides the full biological benefits of daylight—at a fraction of the intensity and energy consumption—positioning companies as true leaders in human-centric building design.
References
https://www.lighttalk.space/read-blogposts/32-the-melanopic-ratio-and-lighting-design
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/vision/bright.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intrinsically_photosensitive_retinal_ganglion_cell
https://chromaviso.com/en/knowledge-about-light/what-is-melanopic-edi
(https://www.innerscene.com/SpecHelp/CircadianSky/melanopic/melanopic.html)
https://www.mouser.com/applications/circadian-lighting-enhances-response/References
https://www.lighttalk.space/read-blogposts/32-the-melanopic-ratio-and-lighting-design
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/vision/bright.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intrinsically_photosensitive_retinal_ganglion_cell
https://chromaviso.com/en/knowledge-about-light/what-is-melanopic-edi
https://www.innerscene.com/SpecHelp/CircadianSky/melanopic/melanopic.html
https://www.mouser.com/applications/circadian-lighting-enhances-response/



Comments